Money, Not Morals, Drives Marijuana Prohibition Movement • View topic - Money, Not Morals, Drives Marijuana Prohibition Movement

Money, Not Morals, Drives Marijuana Prohibition Movement

We are building a large collection of sex-related stuff. Anyone can have us publish their stuff, for free

Money, Not Morals, Drives Marijuana Prohibition Movement

Postby admin_pornrev » Sun Dec 20, 2015 5:11 am

Money, Not Morals, Drives Marijuana Prohibition Movement

FROM: ... -movement/

Ganja.png (136.8 KiB) Viewed 37124 times

by Kendall Bentsen on August 5, 2014

The following is adapted from’s new marijuana issue profile. Read more about the marijuana industry’s campaign donations and lobbying efforts as well as relevant marijuana focused legislation.

In late November 2012, voters in Washington and Colorado passed ballot initiatives to fully legalize marijuana for recreational use. Coloradans were able to start purchasing recreational marijuana on Jan. 1, 2014. As for Washington, the state issued its first retail marijuana licenses about six months later, on July 7th.

So how has Colorado been doing?

Since the beginning of 2014 though early June, Colorado had reaped nearly $11 million in sales and excise taxes on recreational marijuana, with the total take from both recreational and medical marijuana taxes and fees topping out at nearly $18 million, according to the Denver Post. In the fiscal year that begins in July, Colorado could even see $98 million in marijuana tax revenue according to a recent budget proposal from Gov. John Hickenlooper.

But Colorado is not the only state cashing in on marijuana profits. As of August 2014, 22 states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana and 16 have decriminalized it. Of course, along with the arguments for legalizing marijuana — the revenue boost, more effective law enforcement and criminal justice, less money supporting organized crime, and wider access for medicinal use — there are also arguments against it. Marijuana is a drug, and with all drug substances there are side effects — including altered perception, which doesn’t mix well with driving. In an effort to promote safe, recreational cannabis use, Colorado is spending $1 million on television ads reminding users: “Drive High, Get a DUI.” Additionally, the National Institute on Drug Abuse states that marijuana can negatively affect your brain, lungs, heart, and mental health.

Whatever the health effects, the legalization of cannabis brings a formerly black market into the legal economy and gives rise to a new industry that spends money in Washington to further its interests.

On the Other Side of the Coin…
Legalization of marijuana could take a bite out of a range of other interest groups, many of which already spend big money in Washington. (Caution: In most cases, it’s not possible to identify from lobbying reports whether a client supported or opposed an issue.)

• Alcohol and Beer Companies. For the alcoholic beverage industry, legalized marijuana would compete for money Americans devote to leisure pursuits. As a result, some alcohol industries are very slowly beginning to lobby against the legalization of bud. For example, back in 2010 one independent distributor of the California Beer and Beverage Distributors gave $10,000 to Public Safety First, a PAC working against California’s Prop 19 which, if passed, would have legalized various marijuana-related activities in the state. At the federal level, these companies assert their heft by pouring millions into lobbying and campaign donations. Since 2009 the Beer, Wine and Liquor industry has spent at least $19.5 million each year on lobbying efforts, most of which have been focused on alcohol taxes and regulations. And in the 2012 campaign cycle, the industry gave nearly $17.8 million to federal candidates, parties and committees.

• Police Unions. Public Safety First itself, however, is largely funded by a different industry that’s unhappy about the legalization of marijuana: law enforcement. The revenue from waging the war on drugs has become a significant source of financial support for local law enforcement. Federal and state funding of the drug war — as well as the property police forces seize as a part of drug raids — have become significant financial supplements to local forces’ budgets. While these unions exert more influence at the local level (what state or local candidate doesn’t want the endorsement of the Fraternal Order of Police?), they have a presence in Washington as well. Every year since 2008 the National Fraternal Order of Police has spent at least $220,000 on lobbying efforts; the National Association of Police Organizations, $160,000; the International Union of Police Associations, $80,000; and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, $80,000.

• Private Prison Corporations. Private prisons are in the business of filling their jails’ beds, and they make millions by incarcerating nonviolent drug users, such as those convicted for marijuana use and possession, along with violent felons and white-collar criminals. The private prison company GEO is particularly successful at this. In its 2012 annual report, GEO noted that it had filled 65,949 out of 73,000 beds in its 96 facilities; on average the company had a facility occupancy rate of 95.7% for 2012. One of the largest for-profit prison companies, Corrections Corporation of America, even stated in a regulatory filing that keeping the drug war alive is essential to its success as a business: “[A]ny changes with respect to drugs and controlled substances or illegal immigration could affect the number of persons arrested, convicted, and sentenced, thereby potentially reducing demand for correctional facilities to house them.” Since 2008, the Corrections Corporation of America has spent at least $970,000 a year on lobbying, however, in all of its federal lobbying reports it includes a disclaimer that it does not lobby for or against policies that would determine whether an individual is incarcerated. GEO has been less consistent in its lobbying efforts and has spent anywhere between $240,000 to $660,000 a year on lobbying since 2008.

• Prison Guard Unions. Similar to for-profit prison companies, prison guard unions also have a vested interest in keeping nonviolent drug offenders behind bars. The California Correctional Peace Officers Association for example gave $1 million to the successful 2008 campaign against Proposition 5, which would have “reduce[d] the parole terms of nonviolent [drug] offenders” while emphasizing drug treatment and rehabilitation programs. At the national level, many prison guards are represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), one of the most politically active labor unions. In the 2012 campaign cycle AFSCME gave more than $13 million to candidates, parties and committees at the federal level. In 2013, AFSCME spent almost $2.7 million on lobbying efforts.

• Pharmaceutical Corporations. Retired police officer turned anti-drug war lobbyist Howard Wooldridge told the Republic Report in 2012 that one of his biggest opponents on Capitol Hill was the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), given that marijuana can “tak[e] the place of everything from Advil to Vicodin and other expensive pills.” PhRMA is certainly an organization to be reckoned with. In 2013 alone PhRMA spent nearly $18 million on lobbying, ranking it ninth in spending among all lobbying clients. Drug manufacturers gave big in the 2012 elections — nearly $21.8 million to various federal candidates and committees as well as the parties.

Categories: Influence & Lobbying Lobbying Lobbyists Pharmaceutical/Health products

Tags: alaska, alcohol, American Federation of State, arizona, ballot, beer, black market, california, California Beer and Beverage Distributors, California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California's Prop 19, cannabis, Capitol Hill, Center for Responsive Politics, centerforresponsibilityandethicsinwashington, colorado, Conneticut, Corrections Corporation of America, County and Municipal Employees, criminal justice, D.C., decriminalized, delaware, Denver Post, District of Columbia, drug, Drug manufacturers, drug raids, geo, Governor John Hickenlooper, hawaii, Howard Wooldridge, illinois, International Association of Chiefs of Police, International Union of Police Associations, law enforcement, legalize marijuana, legalized, lobbying, maine, marijuana, marijuana industry, maryland, massachusetts, medicinal, mental health, michigan, Mississippi, money, montana, National Association of Police Organizations, national fraternal order of police, National Institute on Drug Abuse, nebraska, nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, nonviolent drug users, North Carolina, ohio, OpenSecrets Blog,, oregon, organized crime, Pharmaceutical Corporations, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, phrma, Police Unions, Prison Guard Unions, Private Prison Corporations, Proposition 5, Public Safety First, recreational marijuana, Republic Report, Rhode Island, sales, tax, war on drugs, washington, Washington state, white-collar criminals
Kendall is the Center's 2014 summer research intern. During her time at Colorado College, Kendall earned a B.A. in Sociology while interning at Senator Michael Bennet's Colorado Springs office. She has previously worked at the Children's Defense Fund as an early childhood development public policy intern, and at Planned Parenthood as a curriculum evaluator and data assistant.

Read all of Kendall's posts
Comments (Comment Guidelines)

Media Contact
Viveca Novak
(202) 354-0111

Count Cash & Make Change. is your nonpartisan guide to money's influence on U.S. elections and public policy. Whether you're a voter, journalist, activist, student or interested citizen, use our free site to shine light on your government.

Join our mailing list and get our weekly money-in-politics newsletter.

About Us
• Mission
• About the Site
• Board
• Staff
• Awards & Accolades
• Funders
• Financial Information
• Employment
• Internships
• Training Opportunities
• Testimonials
• Contact Us
Politicians & Elections
• Congressional Elections
• Congress
• Congressional Committees
• Presidential
• Joint Fundraising Committees
• Personal Finances
• Outside Spending
• Earmarks
• Political Parties
• 2014 Overview
• Historical Elections
• Get Local!
• Donor Lookup
Influence & Lobbying
• Interest Groups
• Lobbying
• Revolving Door
• PACs
• Organizations
• 527s
News & Analysis
• OpenSecrets Blog
• Reports
• Mailbag
• OpenSecrets in the News
• Center Press Releases
• Issue Profiles
• Campaign Finance Links
• Mail List Sign-up
• Learn
• Create
• Community
• Take Action
• Donate
Site Admin
Posts: 832
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:35 pm

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests